| Time | League | Match | Tip | Odds | Score |
| 16:00 | CYP CUP | Pafos VS Chloraka | 1 |
1.20 |
-- : -- |
| 20:00 | SPA CUP | Barcelona VS Ath Bilbao | 1 |
1.54 |
-- : -- |
| 19:45 | ITA | Parma VS Inter | 2 |
1.43 |
-- : -- |
| 18:30 | ITA | Napoli VS Verona | 1 |
1.39 |
-- : -- |
| 20:30 | EPL | Manchester City VS Brighton | 1 |
1.44 |
-- : -- |
| Time | League / Match / Tip | Odds |
|---|---|---|
| 16:00 | CYP CUP Pafos vs Chloraka 1 |
1.20 |
| 20:00 | SPA CUP Barcelona vs Ath Bilbao 1 |
1.54 |
| 19:45 | ITA Parma vs Inter 2 |
1.43 |
| 18:30 | ITA Napoli vs Verona 1 |
1.39 |
| 20:30 | EPL Manchester City vs Brighton 1 |
1.44 |
Stay updated with the latest articles and trends.
| Date | League | Match | Tip | Score |
| 06/01 | WAL | TNS VS Bala | 1 | 2 : 1 |
| 06/01 | SCO | Rangers VS Aberdeen | 1 | 2 : 0 |
| 06/01 | KUW | Al Salmiya VS Al Tadamon | 1 | 1 : 2 |
| 06/01 | ITA | Sassuolo VS Juventus | X2 | 0 : 3 |
| 02/01 | KUW | Al Kuwait VS Al Tadamon | 1 | 7 : 1 |
| 02/01 | ITA | Cagliari VS AC Milan | 2 | 0 : 1 |
| 29/12 | POR | FC Porto VS AFS | 1 | 2 : 0 |
| 29/12 | BHR | Al Khalidiyah VS Al-Budaiya | 1 | 3 : 1 |
| 29/12 | ITA | AS Roma VS Genoa | 1X | 3 : 1 |
| 29/12 | AFCON | Zambia VS Morocco | 2 | 0 : 3 |
| Date | League / Match / Tip | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 06/01 | WAL TNS vs Bala 1 |
2
-
1
|
| 06/01 | SCO Rangers vs Aberdeen 1 |
2
-
0
|
| 06/01 | KUW Al Salmiya vs Al Tadamon 1 |
1
-
2
|
| 06/01 | ITA Sassuolo vs Juventus X2 |
0
-
3
|
| 02/01 | KUW Al Kuwait vs Al Tadamon 1 |
7
-
1
|
| 02/01 | ITA Cagliari vs AC Milan 2 |
0
-
1
|
| 29/12 | POR FC Porto vs AFS 1 |
2
-
0
|
| 29/12 | BHR Al Khalidiyah vs Al-Budaiya 1 |
3
-
1
|
| 29/12 | ITA AS Roma vs Genoa 1X |
3
-
1
|
| 29/12 | AFCON Zambia vs Morocco 2 |
0
-
3
|
| Fixture | Market | Solo Pick | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liverpool vs Manchester United | BTTS (Both Teams To Score) | Yes | High (data + team news) (AiScore) |
Why BTTS is the right single for this game
This fixture historically yields goals from both sides due to the rivalry’s open style and psychological intensity. Liverpool’s pressing game creates chances but can leave gaps, particularly when the opponent commits men forward. Manchester United are set up to exploit transitions and set-piece opportunities, which elevates their away scoring probability.
Key variables we monitored
Goalkeeper situation: Alisson’s absence increases Liverpool’s chance of conceding; cover keeper has performed well but lacks long-term Anfield derby experience. This shifts a pure “Liverpool win” outlook into a goals-for-both scenario. The Standard
Attacking form: Both teams have recent matches indicating goal production; rivalry tension often spikes scoring in both halves. TalkSport+1
Motivation & calendar: This is a headline league fixture — both clubs will target maximum points, discouraging closed, ultra-defensive tendencies and encouraging risk-taking that produces goals. The Guardian
How to execute the solo bet properly
Confirm lineups ~60–90 minutes before KO. If either side rests its main striker or a key creative midfielder is absent, re-consider.
Compare BTTS odds across at least three bookmakers. A small difference (e.g., 1.60 vs 1.75) matters for long-term ROI.
Keep the stake disciplined — solo bets should be a stable percentage of bankroll to avoid volatility.
Consider cash-out thresholds if your bookmaker offers a reasonable early-cash option when the match flows to your favor.
When BTTS could fail (risk factors)
A rare ultra-defensive lineup from one manager (e.g., 5-man backline and two holding mids) could push the match to 0–1 or 1–0.
Early red card that causes one side to sit deep and grind out a result.
Severe weather or pitch issues that reduce open play.
Final words on expected value and reasoning
BTTS Yes in Liverpool vs Man United combines historical evidence, current team news (keeper factor), and tactical matchup. It offers a good balance between risk and reward for a solo selection because it doesn’t require a specific winner — only that both sides score — and the fixture’s characteristics support that outcome. Use disciplined staking and confirm lineups.
Q1: Why not pick Liverpool to win as the solo?
A1: Liverpool to win is a solid view but involves more variance; with Alisson injured and United’s counter threat, BTTS offers better balance and value as a single.
Q2: What if Alisson is unexpectedly fit and starts?
A2: If Alisson is confirmed, re-assess. His presence reduces Liverpool’s conceded-goal probability; however the rivalry’s history still supports BTTS. Consider lowering stake or switching to Liverpool to win if the market offers value.
Q3: Is BTTS + Over 1.5 much better than BTTS alone?
A3: BTTS + Over 1.5 tightens the market slightly (reduces odds) but still keeps good value and removes the tiny risk of a 1–1 causing a lower payout in some parlay contexts. It’s a recommended alternative if odds are attractive.
Q4: How much should I stake on this solo?
A4: Typical conservative staking is 1–2% of your bankroll. Adjust to your risk appetite.
Q5: Where can I check live team sheets?
A5: Official club websites or reputable outlets (LiverpoolFC.com, ManUtd.com, Premier League site, BBC Sport) ~60–90 minutes pre-kick. Manchester United+1